在“双一流”建设背景下,为适应新时代教育与科技发展的新需求,本文明确了信通学科在国家战略性新兴产业中的核心地位,通过系统性梳理文献,在广泛调研的基础上,结合学科发展实践,遵循课程建构的科学性、实用性、整合性、个性化和国际化原则,打破原有课程体系对人才培养的禁锢,优化课程资源,重构了课程模块,为学科高质量发展、培养高素质人才奠定良好的课程基础,进而促进信通一流学科的全面振兴和卓越发展。Against the backdrop of the “Double First-Class” initiative, in order to adapt to the new demands of education and technological development in the new era, this paper clarifies the core position of information and communication engineering disciplines within national strategic emerging industries. By systematically reviewing literature and conducting extensive research, combined with the practical development of the disciplines, and adhering to the principles of scientificity, practicality, integration, individualization, and internationalization in curriculum construction, this paper breaks the constraints of the original curriculum system on talent cultivation, optimizes curriculum resources, and reconstructs curriculum modules. This lays a solid curriculum foundation for high-quality discipline development and the cultivation of high-quality talents, thereby promoting the comprehensive revitalization and excellent development of first-class information and communication engineering disciplines.
论文以大健康教育观为理论基础,提出了“适应和引领未来健康城市的需要,培养基础知识扎实,专业视野宽广,综合素质高的创新复合型人才”的培养目标,关注和思考当代与未来科学发展与社会需求的基本脉络,讨论基于健康建筑理念的建筑学跨学科专业课程体系及其实践的基本策略。相对于传统建筑学培养体系,具有健康建筑视野的专业课程群更加错综复杂,除建筑领域本身外,还涉及环境工程学、公共卫生学、心理学、营养学、人文与社会科学、运动生理学等,各领域与建筑的关系、与健康的关系,与建筑学教学体系的关系都需要持续深入的研究。This paper is based on the theoretical framework of the concept of “big health education” and proposes the training goal of cultivating innovative interdisciplinary talents who are solid in fundamental knowledge, broad in professional perspective, and high in comprehensive quality to meet and lead the future needs of healthy cities. It focuses on and reflects on the fundamental connections between contemporary and future scientific development and social demands. Furthermore, it discusses the interdisciplinary curriculum system of architecture based on health building concepts and its fundamental strategies for practice. Compared to traditional architectural training systems, the professional curriculum group with a health building perspective is more intricate, involving not only the field of architecture but also environmental engineering, public health, psychology, nutrition, humanities and social sciences, exercise physiology, and more. The relationships among these various fields, architecture, health, and the architecture teaching system require ongoing and in-depth research.
